What does the asylum procedure entail?
During the asylum procedure, the Migration department and State Border Guard Service must review your asylum application individually and impartially, verifying the correctness of the evidence and information provided, the credibility of your statements, and performing the necessary procedural acts.
Time limits
Your asylum application must be reviewed within three months of the receipt of the application. The time limit may be extended in limited circumstances listed in the law, if complex issues of fact or law are involved. The time limit may be extended by a maximum of three months.
A clearly unfounded application for international protection may be reviewed under an accelerated procedure, including at the border. Under an accelerated procedure, the application is reviewed within 7 working days. The time limit may be extended by a maximum of 3 working days.
Elements of the procedure
An essential part of the procedure is the asylum interview, in the course of which you are provided with an opportunity to present facts and give explanations with regard to the circumstances that motivated you to apply for international protection. The interview is recorded and a written transcript produced. Responsible authorities may conduct more than one interview or send clarifying questions after the interview, when necessary.
If the Migration department and State Border Guard Service deems it relevant for the assessment of your application, they may arrange a medical examination to establish signs of past persecution. The medical examination is subject to your consent.
You are required to present all the documentation regarding your reasons for applying for international protection as soon as possible, as well as about your background and other aspects relevant to your application.
It is likely that, as an asylum-seeker, you are unable to support your statements by documentary or other evidence. In this case, the main importance lies on assessing the credibility of your statements and comparing them with the available information on your country of origin. The European Court of Human Rights has confirmed that it is important to take into account all the difficulties which an asylum-seeker may encounter abroad when collecting evidence, so benefit of the doubt should be granted in favour of the person seeking international protection.
example You escaped your country due to the threat of imprisonment for being a human rights activist and holding and spreading views that your government does not tolerate. You have no documentary evidence about the treatment you have been subjected to by the authorities, or access to the warrant for your arrest. However, your statements are plausible, coherent, in accordance with the country of origin information, and you have submitted photos that prove your participation in the activities of the human rights organisation. In this case, the authorities should not rely on the lack of documentary evidence to reject your application.
Decision-making
If an institution decides to declare the application for international protection to be unfounded, then before making the decision you must be given an opportunity to provide your counterarguments, either in oral or written form. If the institution makes a negative decision, they have the obligation to give reasons for it in writing in a language that you can understand.